Micro Loans & Cooperation
December 14, 2017
Week 2 | Engaging all Students with Differentiate…
December 14, 2017

Please respond to the following:
Read Case 2.1: Hacking into Harvard, located here or on page 71 in your textbook. As applicants began to defend themselves against the penalties handed out by the business schools, they appealed to both consequentialist and nonconsequentialist criteria to support their actions. Some responded by pointing out that their intentions were never malicious, while others argued they did not think checking their application statuses would cause any real harm. Review the case study and analyze the actions of the students from a Kantian perspective. Consider whether the actions taken by the hackers were permissible according the standard of universal acceptability.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Essay Writing Service